"Americans don't want 97,000 pound trucks or huge multi-trailers up to 120 feet long on our nation's highways," said AAR President and CEO Ed Hamberger. "Nor is it fair that even more of the public's tax dollars will be used to pay for the road and bridge damage inflicted by massive trucks."
Hamberger pointed out that today's heavy trucks only pay a fraction of the costs they inflict on taxpayers. The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that taxpayers currently subsidize nearly $2 billion of large truck damage. The most common truck on the road, an 80,000-pound five-axle single, pays just 80 percent of the maintenance costs it inflicts on roads, while a 97,000-pound six-axle single truck would pay only 50 percent of the damage it causes.
In addition, the AAR says state and local governments are paying even more to repair damage caused by heavy trucks every year and this amount would grow exponentially if truck sizes increase. According to the Department of Transportation, the additional cost of repairing bridge damage caused by raising truck weights to 97,000 pounds could be as much as $65 billion.
"States, cities and taxpayers are already fiscally strapped and it makes no sense to burden them with paying for wear and tear inflicted by massive trucks," Hamberger said. "Rather than increasing the taxpayer burden, this bill should ensure that all modes of transportation pay their fair share."
Hamberger noted that the freight railroad industry pays for the maintenance and upkeep of the country's rail system with private capital.
In addition, academic studies show that raising truck weights to 97,000 pounds from 80,000 could actually result in eight million additional truckloads on America's highways.
"It's not too hard to imagine what would happen to our roads if that is allowed to happen," Hamberger said.