• News

Lawmakers challenge LA mayor on subway funding

Written by admin

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's efforts to fast-track the long-stalled Westside subway faced a challenge (Oct. 20) when a bipartisan group of congressional representatives said the current plan is unlikely to bring immediate federal funding to L.A. County, The Los Angeles Times reports.

Villaraigosa has been
pushing to have the subway completed in 10 years — more than 15 years earlier
than under current estimates. At his urging, the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority board agreed to submit the subway expansion, as well as a plan to
build a light-rail through downtown, as the county’s two projects to compete
for a share of a national pool of federal funding.

But the mayor’s push has inflamed
a regional battle brewing for several years on the MTA board over which transit
projects to pursue. The 14 members of Congress who signed a letter said those
two programs don’t have a good shot at immediate federal funding. Further, they
said the county risks not getting much from the federal New Starts program for
several years unless it adds other regional transit proposals to the
application, including the Gold Line extension east from Pasadena, a rail line
down Crenshaw Boulevard and the Gold Line Eastside extension Phase 2 from East
L.A. to South El Monte or Whittier.

The letter was signed by
Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank), David Dreier (R-San Dimas), Maxine Waters (D-Los
Angeles), Jane Harman (D-Venice) and Diane Watson (D-Los Angeles), among
others.

Villaraigosa, county
Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky and others are pushing to make the Westside subway a
top priority. Officials have been trying to build the line for decades but have
faced numerous barriers, including the estimated $5 billion or more price tag.

Critics, however, have
questioned the logic of spending so much money on one project and suggested
that transportation money could be better spent on less expensive projects
elsewhere in the region. Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, who represents South
L.A. and backs the Crenshaw rail line concept, said the message of the letter
is "that no one plan should dominate. No one rail line should
dominate."

Schiff said that "if
the board does not include these projects, we leave hundreds of millions of
federal dollars on the table that will be directed elsewhere in the
country."

The letter came just two
days before the MTA board is expected to vote on the Long Range Transportation
Plan, a document that outlines the county’s transportation priorities and how
an estimated $300 billion should be spent over the next 30 years.

Others on the MTA board
said the plan already allocates money for the projects that the House members
desire, just not the New Starts funding. They also said the Westside extension
and regional connector are two projects that help not only the Westside but
also the entire region.

"The MTA board
unanimously adopted its federal transit priorities last month, and on the
merits the subway and regional connector have the greatest potential to earn
federal support," Villaraigosa said in a statement.

In September, the board
agreed to submit the Westside subway extension and the downtown connector
linking the Red, Purple, Blue and Gold rail lines as the two projects to
compete for a share of a national pool of federal funding.

The strategy had been for
the board to unanimously approve submission of the Westside subway and downtown
connector to the federal government for New Starts funding. Seeking such
funding for the two projects was included in the long-range plan. But the
congressional delegation’s letter, and actions by other MTA board members
signal that there could be a showdown before the long-range plan is approved.

Yaroslavsky said he
welcomed the delegation’s dialogue with the board. But he said he believes that
if five projects are put up for New Starts funding, none of them will receive
any. And that could mean the death of the Westside subway, which, because its
high cost, is dependent on large amounts of federal money.

"The notion of the
proposal that there would be five New Starts projects in L.A. County is
suicide," Yaroslavsky said. "It’s a prescription for none of the
projects to get federal funding."

Categories: News
Tags: