• News

BNSF trimmers return for a little more

Written by admin

February 14, 2001 Workers were back at the Hump to clean up the recent trimming job that left vegetation looking "ragged," Peace Arch News in British Columbia reports. Phase 2 of trimming started March 1 - a year and a half after protests temporarily halted the first phase - upon requests from Hump residents.

But this month’s work
left vegetation looking "a bit raw and rather unfinished," according to BNSF’s
director of public affairs, who said additional grooming was required.

"It needed to be
smoother, some of the limbs needed to be cut down and tapered to more blend in
with the landscape," Gus Melonas said. "It appeared to be a bit ragged in BNSF’s
view and we want to ensure it’s more aesthetically pleasing."

City manager Peggy Clark
confirmed White Rock has received assurances from BNSF that cutting will not
include the area’s celebrated Eagle tree or other trees surrounding it.

Meanwhile, Don Pitcairn,
a community activist and former provincial Green Party candidate, continued to
protest the latest BNSF trimming, describing it as a "de facto clearcut of the
hump hillside."

Pitcairn, who has long
said such work would threaten slope stability, attached Canadian flags to trees
on the Hump earlier this month, in protest of what he characterized as "the
cutting of Canadian trees by a U.S. company."

"It looks like the second
phase is complete, but I’m awfully concerned we’re going to see more tree
cutting on the Hump at a later date," he said. "I’m interested not only in
protecting stands of big-leaf maple trees but also the famed Eagle-roosting
tree."

Mayor Catherine Ferguson
said she and council members were satisfied after a meeting that BNSF is doing
due diligence with regard to slope stability. "It’s in their best interests to
ensure the stability of the slope, because it’s a liability issue for them if
anything were to fall on the tracks," she said.

Ferguson added that there
is little council can do about such tree trimming on private property. "The
bottom line is that it’s BNSF land, and they can do what they need to do on it.
What we did say was that it would be better for us to be advised in advance of
such work – that way we’re dealing with something we know about, rather than
reacting after the fact."

Melonas acknowledged BNSF
had received phone calls from people who were unhappy with the initial work
earlier this month.

"There were a few
complaints about the cutting and that it did appear to be unfinished and it
does impact the natural look of the vegetation."

He said BNSF consulted
with the architect retained for the project.

"We all agreed additional
blending should occur just for a more tapered, finalized appearance."

Slope stability and
railroad safety would not be impacted, he added. "BNSF wanted to ensure that
natural habitat, that the bald eagles, the evergreens, were not touched, and
the cutting was done in a minimal matter."

Melonas noted the
majority of calls BNSF has received about the project have been favorable.

Categories: News
Tags: